Ceisiadau rhyddid gwybodaeth

Ceisiadau rhyddid gwybodaeth

Mae'r rhestr yma'n cynnwys pob cais Rhyddid Gwybodaeth y mae Cronfa Dreftadaeth y Loteri Genedlaethol wedi'i dderbyn rhwng 1 Ebrill 2021 a 31 Mawrth 2022.

April 2021

  • Requester sought information on the terms and conditions of the Plashet Park project. The grant notification letters were provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), personal information.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s IT service. Part of this information was provided. The Heritage Fund did not hold the strategy information and this part of the request was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on amount awarded to the Lake Vrnywy project. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s grants to mine preservation projects. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s HR data. Part of this information was provided. Some information was withheld under section 22 of FOIA, information intended for future publication, section 40 of FOIA, section 10 of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) transfer of a request, section 12 of the EIR, exceptions to the duty to disclose environmental information, and section 13 of the EIR, personal information. The Heritage Fund did not hold information on the number of official complaints and this part of the request was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on the central government fleet. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on the application form for the Kala Sangam project. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded through the Culture Recovery Fund for Heritage round one. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded through the Heritage Capital Kickstart Fund. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on projects in London and Essex which have received funding under the ‘National Lottery Grants for Heritage from £250,000 to £5million’ programme. No decisions for the programme had been taken at the time of the request. Information was provided on publishing of decisions later in the year.
  • Requester sought information on the application for the Plashet Park project. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on regulation of the Heritage Fund. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Skelton Townscape Heritage Project. Information on the completion report and grant expiration date was provided.

May 2021

  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s auditor. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Skelton Townscape Heritage Project. Information on claims and invoices was provided.
  • Requester sought information on funding decisions relating to the West Pier Trust and communications between the Heritage Fund and the Noble Organisation. Board papers and minutes were provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA. The Heritage Fund did not hold the communications information and this part of the request was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to Autograph ABP. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the application for the Transforming Orleans House project. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on The Manor House, Bingham project. The project enquiry form, application form and decision letter were provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Causeway Memorial School project. Information on the project activities and outcomes was provided.
  • Requester sought information on correspondence between the Heritage Fund and Oliver Dowden. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on centenary projects from 2012 to 2020.This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to the RSPB. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the grant awarded to the National Trust Wimpole Estate. The application and grant agreement documents were provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on investment and applications made to The National Lottery Heritage Fund in Northern Ireland. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund's awards between 2019 to 2021. This information was provided.

June 2021

  • Requester sought information on the Skelton Townscape Heritage Project. Information on the project’s grant expiry date was provided.
  • Requester sought information on payments made to Stonewall Equality Limited. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Skelton Townscape Heritage Project. Information on project expenditure was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Penicuik House project. The grant notification letter and contract were provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund's technology and outsourced services. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on support for The George Pub, Wickham Market project. Two letters of support were provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on diversity training. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to Scottish Environment LINK members. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Skelton Townscape Heritage Project. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to archiving and storage facilities. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Oakwood Clock project. The application, funding decision and correspondence documents were provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the grant award to Totnes Community Development Society’s project to restore the Brunel Building. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Wrest Park Revitalisation project. The application form, grant award letter and contract were provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Cambridge Museum of Technology. Information on projected visitor numbers and income and actual visitor numbers was provided. The Heritage Fund did not hold the actual income from visitors information and this part of the request was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on the Regal Cinema Tenbury Wells project. The grant notification letter was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on Hyson Green Youth Centre’s Cultural Recovery Fund application. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on guidance for grantees. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s family leave policy. This information as provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Broadlands Archive application form. This was provided with some information withheld under section 40 of FOIA, personal information, section 41, provided in confidence, and section 44, prohibition on disclosure.

July 2021

  • Requester sought information on the Catrine Environmental Heritage Project. The application and correspondence was provided. The Heritage Fund did not hold the grant criteria guidance information and this part of the request was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on applications submitted by Paisley Museum and Art Gallery. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on the Reframing Picton project. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on complaints procedures. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Sunderland Mudlarking: Heritage, Health and Wellbeing project. Sections one and two of the application form were provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Great North Wood project. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Highfields Community Association’s Green Recovery Challenge Fund application. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the National Theatre Future project and the presence of asbestos. Part of this information was provided with some information redacted under section 40 and section 43(2), commercial interest, of FOIA. Information on risk registers and construction reports was withheld under section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on Lancashire Wildlife Trust’s Green Recovery Challenge Fund application. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s IT service. This information was provided.

August 2021

  • Requester sought information on the distribution of grants awarded over the past 10 years. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Worlebury Hillfort application form. This information was withheld under section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the terms and conditions of the Pallant House Gallery project. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on The Parish of Wembury Neighbourhood Plan application form. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Recovery Fund in Northern Ireland programme. Part of this information was provided. Some information was withheld under section 41 of FOIA and section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on grant award letter and communications relating to the Catrine Environmental Heritage Project. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s monitoring of The Hold: A Suffolk Archives Service for the 21st Century project. This information was provided with some information redacted under section 40 and section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on a Free App project application form. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on payments made to several charities and third sector organisations. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on sexual harassment complaints. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on bullying complaints. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the terms and conditions of the New River Loop project. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s courier service contracts. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded in the Liverpool City Region. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to the National Trust for the National Nature Reserve at Stackpole. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to St Laurence’s Church in Kirby Misperton. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s IT Service. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s complaints procedures. This information was provided.

September 2021

  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s procurement processes. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on home working equipment. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on Home working equipment over £1000. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s Heritage and Place Research contract. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on Victoria Park, Mansion House. The board decision minutes, grant award letter and standard terms of grant was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Worlebury Hillfort project application. Information on the funding decision and the application form was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the cost allocations for the Morwellham Quay project. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to the Museum of Free Derry. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on The George pub, Wickham Market project delivery round application and business plan. This information was withheld under section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Chief Executive’s salary. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Merlin Recovery project application. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on Cambridge Museum of Technology’s visitor numbers and income. Part of this information was provided. The Heritage Fund did not hold the actual income figures and this part of the request was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on a Devon Wildlife Trust project. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s IT Service. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s IT Service. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on The George pub, Wickham Market project delivery round application. This information was withheld under section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Tooting Common Heritage Park project final report. This information was provided.

October 2021

  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s IT Service. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to projects in the Hastings, Brighton & Hove and Eastbourne local authority areas. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on The George pub, Wickham Market project funding decision. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on awards to Church of England churches. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s information disclosures. This information was provided.

November 2021

  • Requester sought information on the British Library’s Save Our Sounds project. Under section 16 of FOIA, advice and assistance was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s IT Service. Information on malicious email software was provided. The Heritage Fund did not hold information on the percentage of emails and links opened and this part of the request was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on The Memorial Fund’s IT Service. Information on malicious email software was provided. The Heritage Fund did not hold information on the percentage of emails and links opened and this part of the request was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on North Committee minutes for meetings in 2018 and 2019. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on The Heritage Fund’s political monitoring in Wales. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on Green Recovery Challenge Fund rejected applications. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Cassiobury Park project business plan. This information was provided with some information redacted under section 40 and section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Dundee Museum of Transport project assessment paper. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.

December 2021

  • Requester sought information on The Piece Hall Trust Cultural Recovery Fund applications. This information was provided with some information redacted under section 40, section 41 and section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on Portsmouth Sailing Club Centenary 2020 project. Information on the grant award and the involvement of young people was provided.
  • Requester sought information on National Parks projects. The request was refused under section 12 of FOIA, cost of compliance.
  • Requester sought information on the Shared History Fund. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Colyton Parish History Society project. Progress reports and payment request information was provided with some information redacted under section 40 and section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on Hopetoun House Preservation Trust. The Hopetoun in Peril application form and contract and Heritage Emergency Fund application form and grant notification letter was provided with some information redacted under section 40, section 41 and section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the South Devon Steam railway. Part of this information was provided. The Heritage Fund did not hold information on electrification of the railway or the growth of verges and this part of the request was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on objections to The George pub, Wickham Market project. Part of this information was provided with some information redacted under section 40 and section 43(2) of FOIA. Information on individual objection considerations were withheld under section 41 of FOIA. Information on Midlands and East meeting minutes was withheld under section 22 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Beverley Road Townscape Heritage Scheme terms and conditions. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA. 

January 2022

  • Requester sought information on the Reclaiming Reds project. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on RSPB Scotland conservation projects. Grant award letters, guidance and completion reports were provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA. 
  • Requester sought information on Hopetoun House Preservation Trust. Reports for the Hopetoun in Peril project were provided with some information redacted under section 40 and section 43(2) of FOIA. The completion report and payment request for the Heritage Emergency Fund award were provided with some information redacted under section 43(2) of FOIA. The Heritage Fund did not hold information on monitoring of the Heritage Emergency Fund grant and this part of the request was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on lost and stolen electronic devices. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the volume of malicious emails blocked by The Heritage Fund. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Mentoring support for developing heritage projects based in Northern Ireland tender. Information on the assessment methodology and assessment panel was provided. Information on the successful tenderers was withheld under section 22 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to St Pauls Crossover, Birmingham. This information was provided with some information in the application forms redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s social media spending. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s social media reach. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on payment receipts for the Colyton Parish History Society project. This information was provided with some information redacted under section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on losses and special payments. This information was provided.

February 2022

  • Requester sought information on the communications and reporting for the Tavistock Guildhall project. The request was refused under section 12 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on awards made by The Memorial Fund to several charities and third sector organisations. The Memorial Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on awards made by the Heritage Fund to several charities and third sector organisations. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on projects where the applicant was a private owner of heritage. Part of this information was provided. Part of the request relating to repairs to buildings was refused under section 12 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Orkney Native Wildlife Project. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on a grant awarded to St Saviour’s Church, Walthamstow. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s IT service. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the repair and regeneration of St Michael and All Angels Church, Brampton Abbotts. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Hidden Hastings Heritage project. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on archaeology projects in Scotland. The request was refused under section 12 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the terms and conditions of a grant awarded to St John the Baptist Scottish Episcopal Church, Dundee. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Mentoring support for developing heritage projects based in Northern Ireland tender. Part of this information was provided. Information on the successful tenderers was withheld under section 22 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on St Pauls Crossover’s Ideal Village Park application. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Sport in the Community: shaping NI for 100 years project. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on Heritage Emergency Fund grants awarded to heritage railways. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on The Piece Hall Halifax Heritage project. The application form and business case was provided with some information redacted under section 40 of FOIA. The site plans were withheld under section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to Historic Designed Landscapes. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on Intangible Cultural Heritage in Scotland. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.

March 2022

  • Requester sought information on the Honresfield Library project. Part of this information was provided with some information redacted under section 40 of FOIA. Information on a private donation, statements of significance and library manuscripts was withheld under section 41 of FOIA. Information on the consortium, valuation and a condition report was withheld under section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Greensand Commons project application. This information was provided with some redacted under section 40 and section 43(2) of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Tavistock Guildhall project progress reports. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on the Save Our Sounds project communications. The request was refused under section 12 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on Heritage Enterprise Grants Awards. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on employee guidance. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Tomorrow's Museum for Dorset: Re-Imagining Dorset County Museum project application forms. This information was provided with some personal information redacted under section 40 of FOIA.
  • Requester sought information on any insurance the Heritage Fund held. The Heritage Fund did not hold any relevant information, and this was a nil return.
  • Requester sought information on grants awarded to Jewish organisations. This information was provided.
  • Requester sought information on the Heritage Fund’s gender pay gap report. Part of this information was provided. The Heritage Fund did not hold information on costs and benefits assessments and this part of the request was a nil return.

Further information

Nod y cynllun cyhoeddi hwn yw rhoi trosolwg o'r sefydliad a'r wybodaeth sydd gennym a'i chyhoeddi.

For queries, please email foi@heritagefund.org.uk.