Evaluation

Evaluating the Great Place Scheme has been a key part of our plans from the start. The report on the first year of the programme is the first of three reports that will give us insight into three overarching questions: How best to re-position culture in local decision making, planning and delivery?

Renaisi and Centre for Youth Impact are conducting an independent programme evaluation, tracking change and progress of the programme over five years. They are working closely with the twelve funded KtD projects, to assess the impact of the programme, improve project evaluation, encourage reflective

Introduction – HLF Centenary activities and the evaluation As part of the 2014-18 commemoration of the Centenary of the First World War (FWW), the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) is undertaking a range of activities through both grant-making and working with Government on the UK-wide Centenary programme

The Heritage Endowments evaluation is tracking the progress of grantees over four years as they run their fundraising campaigns.

HLF commissioned Mott MacDonald, with The Leisure Consultancy, in 2016 to evidence the heritage, social and economic/community impacts of the Heritage Grants Programme (2002-2007) for the UK. The basis for the 2002-2007 programme was HLF’s second strategic plan ‘Broadening the Horizons of Heritage’.

The grant programme is open, meaning applications can be made at any time and for any type of heritage activity. It was launched in February 2013 and is scheduled to run until March 2018. HLF commissioned Simon Jaquet Consultancy Services Ltd to evaluate the Sharing Heritage grants programme to:

A grants programme funding high quality, paid, work-based training opportunities which help attract new entrants to the heritage workforce.

Interim report from the on-going Our Heritage programme evaluation.

This report summarises the results of the Heritage Lottery Fund’s Output Data survey for Heritage Grants projects.

This report analyses all HLF social impact research undertaken between 2005 and 2011, and considers how the social benefits of HLF funding could be increased.